Slide 4 S.L.Olsen 4/4/96 Pictel mtg LOOK FOR K1(1270) IN J/psi-->k+k-pi+pi- DECAYS INTRODUCTION The psi'-->k1(1270) kbar decay mode appears to be reasonably large, something like 0.1%. Applying the 14% rule in reverse, this leads to an expectation of order 0.7% each for J/psi->k1+k- and J/psi->k10k0bar, which would rank them with the dominant J/psi->hadrons decay channels. However, there is no entry for this mode in the PDG. In the absence of any J/psi data, I looked at J/psi-->k+k-pi+pi- decays via the cascade decays: psi'-->pi+pi- J/psi | k+k-pi+pi- With some simple selections on the 6prng data and a 5c fit, I was able to isolate a reasonably clean sample of 244 events. Here I note results of a first look at these data. Fig 8a: An M_{kpipi} vs M_{kpi} scatterplot (2 entries/event). Here one can see some hint of a concentration of points near M_{kpi}=0.89 and M_{kpipi}=1.4 GeV. Fig 8b: The k pi pi mass distribution (2 entries/event). Here there is a peak near 1.4 GeV and maybe another one at 1.7 GeV. Fig 8c: The pi pi mass distribution for events with M_{kpipi}<1.55. No strong rho signal. Fig 8d: The k pi mass distribution for events with M_{kpipi}<1.55. A very strong k*(890) signal. Fig 8e: The k*pi mass distribution. Here a peak at 1.4 GeV is evident. Fig 8f: The k "rho" mass distribution. There is some action around 1.4 GeV, maybe something at 1.7 GeV, but not even a hint of the K1(1270). Fig 9: A fit to the k*pi mass distribution using the PDG values for the mass and width of the k1(1400). A good fit and good agreement with the PDG values. PUZZLE: Why does he psi' decays to k1(1270 k but not k1(1400) k while the J/psi decays to k1(1400) k, but not k1(1270) k?